Related topics

route add ... doesnt work
I have a batch file that I use to add routes to a specific group of networks once the connection is established. there is a dhcp server assigning IPs so I can't add a static route. this used to work(after the dial connection was established): That batch file would do a route print writing the results to a text

bin/9012: route add -host hostIP -interface localIP doesn't work
Hello Robert, here is tho whole route print output: I hope there is no problem with the german headers 172.16.201.28 belongs to vpn1 192.168.104.0 belongs static route for Home VPN users I have not activated "use default route on remote gateway", instead I do a route add per batch file after connecting vpn's.

Vista: Determine Windows directory - SHGetKnownFolderIDList
The actual syntax that I use in the batch file is route add 192.168.2.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 You can add the metric statement if you'd like but it will You can manually add a route to your worstation. I'm not 100% sure of the syntax (anybody else help on that?) but here goes: route add 192.168.2.0

ports/35016: [maintainer-update] net/freenet6 to work on 4.5
I'm assuming the below is some kind of routing deal, but why is a route defined on the routing server? I'm trying to add another server (192.168.254.254) that can be accessed from the load balancer, server1 and server2. Seems simple enough: route add -host 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.1 but that didn't work.

COTA: Motorized infantry and rugged terrain
lvegas007 "lvegas007(REMOVE)"@(ME)my-deja.com alt os linux mandrake vhdl...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have tried to use command "route add ...." to add an entry to the routing table. After I added it, I check it with route and it seems ok. However, after I reboot the machine, the route disappears.

will this configuration work??!
I don't want to route DHCP requests as there is a DHCP server on each network. What am I missing help! I set this up once before about a year ago and it worked, don't think I used static routes though. Lost config in urgent OS change. If I do a route add 184.155.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 192.168.200.7 on my DC,

Help! /dev/tcp ip_forwarding, doesn't work!
If it can't be via route A because route A unreasonably affects the next person, then one should look for routes B and C which may not rather than giving up .... The distributor took the trouble to answer all of my questions in detail including how service arrangements work. I should immediately add that Viessmann

Cannot Get 3COM 3C905-TX to work in TCP/IP
Jason Bassford jas...@dante.com comp os linux misc but when I run a command like route add 127.0.0.1 I get the following error message: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument As you should. You must specify where you want the first IP address to be routed to. You're missing an argument. Read the documentation for "route".

fun with route(8)
It's the "route add -net ..." command, but I don't wanna guess any wrong or untested answers here. See: http://www.sco.com/cgi-bin/ssl_getmanpage?route+ADMN+OS5+route I'm rather suspicous that the number of packets on net0 and net1 are zero. Duz this thing work or did you just reboot?

source based routing help needed
I think a setfib option is more consistent than running route under setfib command. Also, routing sockets and routing daemons - should they work with only one table?.. if you do setfib 3 route get 1.1.1.1 you may get a different result from setfib 2 route get 1.1.1.1 I will add a fibnum argument to route itself as

Routing Table
... changing interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work s kern/39937 net ipstealth issue f kern/62374 net panic: free: multiple frees s kern/81147 net [net] by FreeBSD o bin/118987 net ifconfig(8): ifconfig -l (address_family) does not wor o kern/119432 net [arp] route add -host <host> -iface <nic> causes arp e o

Routing over Internet to private 10.xxx subnet
... netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 128.6.69.255 route add net 127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 0 route add net 128.6.69.0 127.6.69.1 0 route add default 128.6.69.1 1 With that setup.cmd, Pinging 127.0.0.1, 128.6.69.122, nwk-physics1, and localhost all work. The problem occurs only if I am trying to access another machine.

SCO OSR505 as a router does not work
For example it's very cheap to buy a Postscript rom off Ebay for any of the larger HP laserjets and only a few minutes work with a screwdriver to add it. However, like probably on many other places the system administrators choose "easy" route which is using CUPS and buying printers that are documented to work

Roboinst problems
When the VPN is up, server2 has an IP address on my work LAN for the virtual interface-the "VPN adapter" (10.xxx). Now for the tricky part. I share the VPN connection with ICS on server2 just as I would share a real internet connection, and I have a static route on server1 as: route add 10.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0

Problems with DNS on Irix 6.5
If you don't need anything except the work Class C, you >MIGHT< be able to get by with a NoWorkIP.bat that simply: route delete 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 route delete 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 route add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 (orig DSL gateway IP address) You'll need to experiment with ROUTE. I wasn't able to use -p for

DHCP: Static Route option - does it work ?
2. add a route on the sbs server to their network pointing at the modem pc ("route add ABCD mask #.#.#.# 10.58.77.Modem /p") 3. How's that supposed to work? "Geoff Cox" <geoff....@cableinet.co.uk> wrote in message news:ml80mt05ehd1d5oha1aerd5d056k49c814@4ax.com... Should have added that the PC with the modem is

cRe: Using ISDN & DSL together
I add it the following way: route add <ip address of site> <gateway address> and I delete it this way route del <ip address of site> <gateway address> I have talked to some people who add routes by the format of: route add -host <ip address of site> <gateway address> Both ways should work.

PPP problems, ping & traceroute work, ftp & telnet don't
ORG mailing freebsd bugs Synopsis: route add -host hostIP -interface localIP doesn't work State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: ru State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 6 10:57:55 PDT 2001 State-Changed-Why: It works, that's exactly how ARP entries are stored in the routing table. This command merely emulates

Route add -p does not work on Win98
Neteng neteng.c...@gmail.com microsoft public win2000 networking These will not work because he has no DG. He would have to add the route with the next hop being on the local subnet. A detailed explanation was posted at groupstudy. "Doug Sherman [MVP]" <dsher...@nospamtampabay.rr.com> wrote in message

Multiple IP addresses on one NIC and shares don't work!
Anyway, the normal loopback entry is "route add -net 127.0.0.0". I have had the exact same problem, when trying to add device ppp0 when I use the commmand route add -net default dev ppp0 Can't use "-net" and "default" together. That doesn't make any sense. Try something like: route add default gw <ppp-ip-addr> Or