Related topics

-iface option doesn't work in route command
On NetBSD, I do: # ifconfig en0 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up # route add -iface 192.168.10.2 -link en0:3.0.0.64 # pvcsif en0 # ifconfig pvc0 2425 2627 2829 2a2b 2c2d 2e2f 3031 3233 3435 3637 ...and ping doesn't work from Solaris7 either: 23:42:39.933222 f03a003080c20007 00000000 00 00 08 00-45-00 0054:

Ping doesn't work after connected to dialup ISP
No both 56K Modem on linux is external US Robitics 56k on XP lucent PCI win modem 56k I think your: pings work from XP to Linux and Linux to XP works, Read the man or XP Home for details of the route statements. Basically it's route [add|del] -host ipaddr or route add default -dev ppp0 this is a very very

default AS show behavior
But is your syntax right? route add -p 160.120.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 130.11.11.75 In article <38281D52.2D441...@ops.de>, Carsten Hammer <Carsten.Ham...@ops.de> wrote: Hi, If you change the ip-address of the pc you can make the command work. On some pcs it works without a change of the ip-address.

error when following Agile Web Development in RoR
Al @Work A...@Work.AllTheTime.net microsoft public win98 networking Ovidiu, You can create a ".pif" file to run the "route add" command after bootup. Kent England sent me one for my home use awhile back. If I still have it saved somewhere on my home machine, I don't use it anymore, I will post it tonight.

Routing confusion
By default interrupts must not be routed to the isolated CPU(s) User must route interrupts (if any) to those CPUs explicitly. A better approach would be to add a flag to the cpuset infrastructure that says whether its a system set or not. A system set would be one that services the general purpose OS and would

Can't get WEP wireless Encryption to work
Or will Jet2 add this route? Orlando: Will Virgin increase frequency and go year round? Or as I fear, back to summer only flights? Palma: Easyjet increase or new Jet2 route? FlyGlobespan's work force is becoming increasingly unhappy and the talk of strike action is becoming more and more all the time.

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
... =20 route add 198.82.223.123 198.82.223.79 -iface fxp1 =20 ie i want to tell my machine to look for 198.82.223.123 on interfacet fxp1 instead of fxp0, and use 198.82.223.79 as the gateway, i get the following error/bug: bad address : fxp1 Did you try route add 198.82.223.79 -iface fxp1 route add 198.82.223.123

2nd & 3rd Ip address does not work on boot up
So, the output of ifconfig. the output of route -n. The result of running route add -net xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0 The result of doing route add default gw yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy eth0 where yyy is the addr of the gateway on the net as seen in the Redhat bootup and xxx is the network as seen in the redhat

multihomed linux box - dual t1
Andreas Jellinghaus a...@dungeon.inka.de fa linux net ip -f inet6 route add default dev sit1 metric 512 ip -f inet6 route add 2000::/3 dev sit1 metric 512 the first does not work, the second does. any idea why ? my router fails to forward the package with destination unreachable. itīsa kernel 2.3.39 from the

Re^2: Telnet does not work in 2.0.10 ??
So lets say my home IP is 212.212.212.212, the gnatbox is 194.1.1.1 and the work machine I'm trying to access is 10.10.10.10 I need to ssh to 10.10.10.10 from my home linux box, and obviously I'll need to add a route to say where data for the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet should go. I've tried: route add -host 194.1.1.1

Routing confusion
Find a command prompt, and run the commands '/sbin/ifconfig -a' and '/sbin/route -n' before, during and after dialing in. overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Memory:964038-964c04 and this should add _TWO_ lines to the routing table: [van-allen ~]$ /sbin/route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask

default route does not work.
Add the #search method name to the resource route for the item being searched by something like: map.resources :items, :collection => { :search => :post } This says to add a route for /items/search and map it to the #search method. This only accepts POST requests. (You should find that "map.resources :items" is

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
ORG mailing freebsd bugs Synopsis: route add -host hostIP -interface localIP doesn't work Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->ru Responsible-Changed-By: ru Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 6 11:11:20 PDT 2001 Responsible-Changed-Why: Explanations were mine. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=9012 To

Solaris routing reference, please?
ORG sol lists freebsd bugs Synopsis: route add -host hostIP -interface localIP doesn't work State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: ru State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 6 10:57:55 PDT 2001 State-Changed-Why: It works, that's exactly how ARP entries are stored in the routing table.

How does the route command work?
Now depending how complicated the work network is and the IPs you have to access, you can add a route to your work via it's gateway. One IP is easy, because it is ROUTE ADD xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx MASK 255.255.255.255 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy where x is the IP of the work site and y is the IP of the gateway as determined via

Win2003 hangup 1 outg. VPN conn. interrupts traffic at 2. outg
Telneting from another Linux Box into the same machine does not work either. But if i telnet in from a Windows machine over the ethernet, it works just fine. I checked the network setup files and found that when it called the route add command,it was calling it with "route add -net 127.0.0.1", and it should be

Resource Loading
... changing interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work s kern/39937 net ipstealth issue f kern/62374 net panic: free: multiple frees s kern/81147 net [net] by FreeBSD o bin/118987 net ifconfig(8): ifconfig -l (address_family) does not wor o kern/119432 net [arp] route add -host <host> -iface <nic> causes arp e o

TLS709 Does not work!
... Add route to this host AmiTCP:bin/route add $ppp0IPLocal localhost ; Add route to the default gateway AmiTCP:bin/route add default $ppp0IPRemote SetEnv for clarity, reads: rx "address AMITCP; 'ADD HOST 158.152.97.177 stokes.demon.co.uk stokes'" I missed it because I used my customised Startnet script from

Please help me get TCP/IP 2.0 to work
So what we tried was: route add -host 194.123.128.10 194.123.123.250 -interface route add -net default 194.123.128.10 result: couldn't even ping the uplink. second route doesn't work, 'network unreachable'. next try: (deleting the above routes first) route add -host 194.123.128.10 -interface xl2 route add -net

ppp and tcp/ip 4.3 won't work together?
However, if they change either the scheduled Start or Finish date, they should add a Note to document the reason for the change. Regarding your use of the Proposal feature, you are absolutely right. That MIGHT work, but here are the limitations: 1. You are limited to only ONE resource per task. 2.